Skip to main content

There Must Be Opposition in All Things: Including to Mormonism

A fundamental truth taught in the Book of Mormon says that there must be opposition in all things.  If this were not the case then what would we be?  We would be mere pawns in a neutral playground, not growing or learning by making choices and experiencing the consequences.  

All things have some type of opposite or opposition otherwise we would not have a choice. Good things have opposition to them. The question is where does the opposition come from? 

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints has been opposed from many sources since it was founded.  Mormonism is the nickname for the teachings and theology of the church, also known as the Mormon church, again a nickname initially meant to be a slur against the organization and its members.

For almost 200 years Joseph Smith has been the Prophet of the Restoration to millions of Latter-Day Saints.  To a handful of active critics and their proteges, he was a simple boy that orchestrated a grand religious scheme.  Which was he?

The modern technology allows for the mass dissemination of opinions and information, both true and false. Opinion narratives drive much discussion in politics, religion, science and any number of subjects. The reader or listener must evaluate and think critically about what they hear and see.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints attests that it is the true and living church of Jesus Christ and that he stands at the head of it.

The Savior established a church when he was on the earth. Catholics make some claim to being the "true" church but Protestants can't make such a claim. None of them carry the name of the Savior and claim authority to be what is termed the Kingdom of God on the earth, except the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. Why is this?

Some critically minded people just can't seem to accept the fact that even the Lord's church is full of imperfect people. Leaders and members alike are such people.  Certain events and practices they don't agree with have occurred in its history. What if there were an unblemished past in the church?  Ther would still be things some didn't like.  Even so by what authority do they judge? Only with their opinions and fallaciously formed judgments. 

They represent themselves and have no claim to any authority and claim no credentials to speak for God. They speak for themselves. Their opinions are not designed to lift others or to take a person anywhere except away from the church.

Critics are using bias or deception to portray their story to misinform people. Their claim is that Joseph Smith managed to establish a 2000 year ruse and do or cause to be done other evil things in the process. They have set up a burden of proof that can't be met. He was willing to die for his claim.  Was he was, in fact, a prophet of God bearing testimony of truth? How do you recognize a true prophet? You study the fruits of his ministry.  

The many voices of discord and discussion against the LDS church are often uninformed individuals parroting information that was they have heard. They fail to study the matters and persist in rationalizing their own lack of spiritual progress by tearing down the church. The sad thing is they have nothing to offer in the least to replace it.

Mormon critics practice what can be described as a "wilderness of mirrors." They create an environment where the information provided blends truth, half-truth, opinions, lack of historical context and fiction so that uninformed readers or listeners have a difficult time telling what is true and what isn't. Someone with certain doubts may gravitate to it and use it as a reason to justify their doubts.

The critics accuse Joseph Smith of being a false prophet, of building a following and a church by declaring that he had received visions and visitations from God. Then they accuse the church of lying to cover up Joseph's "true" character based on little-known facts of cultural insignificance from the early 1800's, or of allegations regarding the practice of polygamy and other practices that may seem strange or out of the ordinary without other information.

They use fallacies in defining their narrative of Joseph's youth. They tell of things that were normal and cultural in the 1820's that would seem strange if you did them in our day and age. It is like comparing the practice of bleeding sick patients in early medical practices to how a disease is cured today. 

The critical narratives depend on a listener's lack of knowledge and lack of desire or opportunity to get all of the facts to know what the actual circumstances were. If the false narrative comes from someone they trust, like a Christian church there is a tendency to dismiss the need for more information. These narratives have been repeated over and over in churches and on the internet around the world.

The process is readily identifiable for the purpose of spreading false information. Such was the case with me after I joined the church in 1973. I was taken to a church where a lecture was being given to explain why the Mormon Church was the fabrication of a "con artist". Their methods and actions of teaching and disseminating are the real work of "con artists".  Here is what they suppose.

The critics base their overall antagonism against the church from an irrational standpoint.  They want people to believe that a 14-year-old boy, Joseph Smith made up a story and told multiple lies to support it over a 30 year period. These lies would become a con for centuries to come over a changing leadership and uncertain conditions. The church would endure substantial persecution and eventually become established throughout the world and known for its moral and family values.

Could a 14-year-old boy really stick to a story so profound as saying he saw and talked to God and angels for his whole life while being persecuted for it? A story that led directly to his early death at 44 years of age. Several versions of the first vision have surfaced but if you have ever tried to write about something in your past you will soon discover the weakness of the mind in recalling exact events.  Some were accounts he told to others that later wrote them down.

This story and movement also included the development of theological teachings the were starkly different from mainstream Christianity.  He explained the contradictions in their teachings and doctrinal conclusions. This increased the persecutions in attempt to defame him.

God was a person he said, with a glorified and exalted body and so was Christ. We were created in their image and likeness. Current orthodox teachings taught that God was a genderless incorporeal intelligence that assumed 3 personalities and was worked into the narrative of the Bible.

As a boy prophet in 1820, in the United States, he saw God and was visited by resurrected apostles and prophets that laid their hands on his head to ordain and give him authority. No other church founder has made such claims of authority that the fullness of Christ's gospel would be restored to actually prepare the world for the second coming of Jesus Christ.  The only things that had taken place before were reformations of the existing churches.  None claimed authority to be the true church. 

One of the angels that ministered to him told him that his name would be had for good and evil throughout the world. A very unlikely scenario for a 14-year-old boy in upstate New York in 1820 yet it is so. 

Today 190 years later that you can speak his name in religious circles around the world and they know his name, some for good and others for ill. His critics have fulfilled the prophecy.   

It wasn't enough to see God and angels and to tell all the other churches their theology had certain flaws. He brought forth another book calling it scripture and that he had translated it from gold plates.  How does one get such an idea for a story, let alone come up with a whole book and calling it scripture? According to his critics, the whole story is a fabrication from Joseph's imagination or copying some other book.

He didn't just call it any book. It was another testament of Jesus Christ and that he of all people translated it from those gold plates by using an instrument used by other prophets.  Anyone that reads it with an inquiring mind will see that a person of ill intent could not have written it. An evil man could not have written it and a good man would not have written it to deceive others.

He declared that this book was the most correct scripture on earth containing the pure doctrine of Christ. After 190 years no one has determinedly proven it not to be so. Millions testify that it is. Hundreds of millions of copies have been distributed throughout the world in 110 languages.

Over the next 20 years or so he said he received the mind and will of the Lord regarding many subjects and the kingdom of God in preparation for the second coming of the Lord in his glory. 

He called it scripture too, the Doctrine and Covenants. Imagine the idea of saying that modern revelation came to a latter-day prophet. His detractors would call him a false prophet but they couldn't prove it or stop his testimony.

Through all of this, he was persecuted by many enemies on many fronts.  His children dying, his family suffering. But what con man would not endure such acts of persecution and suffering?

Then of all things, 10 years after his first vision at age 24 and with no clerical training he started a church. He said it would eventually be on every continent and spread throughout the world.  It would be patterned after the Lord's church in the New Testament.  His critics could not stand for such a thing. The made sure to label it a cult lest any consider joining it.

No critics or enemies could stop its progress Joseph testified. Looking at it today, that prophecy has been fulfilled after abundant barriers and challenges that could or should have stopped it, including his death. Today 30,000 plus geographic congregations exist around the globe and are led by a volunteer unpaid clergy.

Was it some grand con to organize the church using local volunteers?  Even so, some of the best and the brightest minds would be attracted to it and lead it through all kinds of adversity at all levels.  It would survive times of trouble and later prosper much to the disdain of the church's detractors.

The most brilliant part of the con is it would be pulled off for the most part after Joseph Smith was dead. The vast majority of his followers would never meet or know Joseph Smith in person. This would truly have to be one of the greatest cons in history.  Using a dead man's story to build a thriving church throughout the world.

The first missionaries traveling through the world would go telling the story on foot and horseback and be traveling across the oceans by ship. Many tens of thousands would join the church. They would cross a desolate wilderness and established a community in the mountains of Utah.  A hundred years later the messengers would be 18 to 22-year-old youths leaving their homes and paying their own way for two years at a time and millions would join the church.

Mormon critics don't like the fact that missionaries tell people that they can read the Book of Mormon and pray to find out if it is true.  It has happened for millions of us.

They call members of the church ignorant fools that have pledged their lives to the church through baptismal covenants and found ongoing purpose and happiness being aware of their eternal destiny through temples. 

Members don't use tobacco or drink alcohol, tea or coffee.  This part of the con clearly demonstrates a brainwashing effect. He told believers about health issues unproven by science until at least a hundred or so years after his death. Surely he had some hidden techniques of mind control yet to be discovered by modern psychologists. 

"Joseph Smith’s vision of man’s immortal nature reached from an existence before birth to the eternities beyond the grave. He taught that salvation is universal in that all men will become the beneficiaries of the Resurrection through the Atonement wrought by the Savior. But beyond this gift is the requirement of obedience to the principles of the gospel and the promise of consequent happiness in this life and exaltation in the life to come."

How is it that just a handful of modern critics and apostates are the only people smart enough to recognize this con that has become a worldwide church.  A church that blesses the lives of millions. 

The evidence and testimony of the Spirit of God confirm to me that he was a prophet of the living Christ. His critics are more likely to be the con artists, telling an outrageous tale in a crooked narrative of deception designed only to misinform.


Popular posts from this blog

How Can We Have An Eternal Family?

I attended a traditional Christian church with my parents as a young boy.  I later learned that the fundamental precepts of our theology were that marriage and family relationships as we know them were temporary and ended at death. I did like the feeling I got when I went to church but the teachings didn't really make sense

My mother died a month before I turned nine. After her death, I lived with a lingering curiosity about heaven and wondering if there were answers to this mystery of life. The vague concepts of what heaven might be like in traditional Protestantism were not that reassuring.

I later learned that the idea of eternal family relationships was a teaching unique to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (The Mormon Church).

As I attended church with some friends and learned about what they believed about life after death it made so much sense. The plan of life and salvation that centers on Jesus Christ and was ordained by our Father in Heaven is centered in …

The Eternal Human Soul

What is the nature of our soul and does it endure beyond death? Can a purposeful life be established without knowing something about the eternal principles or laws by which we exist? As we look at the endless creations in a vast cosmos do we ponder our place?  Are we eternal beings with great potential or temporary flashes of electro-chemical or cosmic energy with any significance at all?

I can only relate to what I have learned from being married for almost four decades, raising eight children, counseling with others as an ecclesiastical leader and reading and attending educational and leadership seminars and other life experiences. I will cover some of the understandings that I have had over my lifetime. I became a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints when I was 17 years old. My opinions reflect my religious theology but are of course are my own and are not to be construed as anything on behalf of the church. What is the human soul? Is there an eternal aspect to o…

Does Everything Happen for a Reason?

The rain falls and the sun shines. Plant the seeds, pull the weeds, reap a harvest.  Don't plant the seeds, there is no need to pull the weeds and reap no harvest.

What is the reason that things happen? Is life a predetermined course?  Does God micromanage the affairs of earth and its people? There are people that say everything happens for a reason. Does it?  

Other people take a different approach to the philosophy of life. Not everything in life will turn out the way we plan or want it to.  Why would someone think that God would have his hand in making one person's life better than another's? 

I have noticed in exploring this subject there will be contradictions and questions on all sides of the equation of life.  Isn't that the purpose though, to have faith and act the best we can and enjoy the journey?

The scriptures indicate and I believe that God sends us to earth at times that are pre-appointed. He also holds power over the duration of our life and our death, yet i…